Category: KOMPOSITA

1

Revolution

Koselleck 100

Disha Karnad Jani – In our re-examination of Koselleck’s work on his centennial, I ask what happens when we turn one of his characteristics for modern concepts – the “simultaneity of the non-simultaneous” – on its head. Why, I ask, did his work on the modern concept of revolution and the revolutions of the 1950s-70s appear to him as inassimilable?

0

Seriality

Koselleck 100

Sean Franzel – Though the term seriality is not a central element of Koselleck’s critical vocabulary, his work is very much attuned to how patterns of repetition and variation—defining features of serial forms—shape experiences of historical events, organize language use, and inform how historical sources are produced and evaluated.

0

Habitus

Koselleck 100

Ingrid Gilcher-Holtey – Das Telefon läutet. Am Apparat ist Reinhart Koselleck. Ob ich schon die FAZ gelesen habe? Wenn nicht, müsse ich sofort losgehen, um ein Exemplar zu kaufen, und die Sportseite aufschlagen. Dort fände ich ein Bild, das ausdrücke, was Bildung nicht ist. Das Bild, auf das Koselleck meine Aufmerksamkeit richtet, hängt seitdem an meiner Regalwand.

1

Koselleck’s Theory of History and Its Subversive Potential

Koselleck 100

Victor Neumann – Despite the fact that Koselleck’s history of concepts and theory of history have long remained fairly marginal in Germany, the impact of Koselleck’s work in the international context is impressive. Kritik und Krise and Vergangene Zukunft were translated into several languages immediately after their appearance in German, while Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe served as a model universally recognised by the academic world in Europe and the Americas.

0

Defeat

Koselleck 100

Geoffrey Winthrop-Young – Koselleck wrote that defeat in war is the greatest transformational experience because it maximizes the distance between a planned course of action and an unplanned outcome. Therefore, as unpleasant or traumatic as it may be, being defeated “contains an inexhaustible epistemological potential” and has stood behind many innovations in historical methodology, including his own following his experience as a soldier of the defeated German army.

Horizonte

Koselleck 100

Javier Fernández-Sebastian – En el mundo moderno estamos más que acostumbrados a considerar el horizonte como el tropo por excelencia para el futuro. Usado progresivamente desde el siglo XIX por filósofos, historiadores y teóricos, y vulgarizado por los periodistas y por los hombres de negocios, casi ha dejado de percibirse como una metáfora.

0

Horizon

Koselleck 100

Javier Fernández-Sebastian – In the modern world, we are more than used to considering the horizon as the trope par excellence for the future. Used progressively since the nineteenth century by philosophers, historians, and theorists, and vulgarised by journalists and businessmen, it has almost ceased to be perceived as a metaphor.

0

GhostConceptKoselleck

Koselleck 100

Ethan Kleinberg – Consider the Komposita “KoselleckConceptGhost” (Koselleckbegriffgespenst). The agglutination is not stable, and it is unclear which term should lead the way. If it is Koselleck, or Koselleck’s ghost, that leads, then the injunction is to investigate the semantic value of the word “ghost” to determine whether there has been a change in its valence and significance over time.

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search